On September 27, 2015 5:13:59 PM GMT+02:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal <ajit.kumar.agar...@xilinx.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Segher Boessenkool [mailto:seg...@kernel.crashing.org] >Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2015 7:49 PM >To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal >Cc: GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli >Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala >Subject: Re: [Patch,optimization]: Optimized changes in the estimate >register pressure cost. > >On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 04:51:20AM +0000, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote: >> SPEC CPU 2000 benchmarks are run and there is following impact on the > >> performance and code size. >> >> ratio with the optimization vs ratio without optimization for INT >> benchmarks >> (3807.632 vs 3804.661) >> >> ratio with the optimization vs ratio without optimization for FP >> benchmarks ( 4668.743 vs 4778.741) > >>>Did you swap these? You're saying FP got significantly worse? > >Sorry for the typo error. Please find the corrected one. > >Ratio with the optimization vs ratio without optimization for FP >benchmarks ( 4668.743 vs 4668.741). With the optimization >FP is slightly better performance.
Ah, I see. Sorry for the noise.. Thanks,
