Hi, For the previous analysis "libjava patches for RTEMS"[1], there are 6 cases need to pay more attention. PR18699, TLtest, Thread_Interrupt, Thread_Sleep_2, Throw_2 and bclink.
After add patch to bdwgc for RTEMS pthread support[2]: PR18699 PASS after Modify [A bug in boehm-gc on RTEMS, not related to libjava] TLtest PASS Thread_Interrupt PASS For the other 3 cases: Thread_Sleep_2 PASS [After add patch to rtems] Throw_2 PASS [After add patch to libjava, still need some work][3] bclink UnSupport [-findirect-dispatch do not support in this case] I think it's time to send out the patch for review, because it may need much time to modify. The patch is attached. How to mark those unsupported cases as expected failures on *-*-rtems* ? [1]http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q3/msg00016.html [2]http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q3/msg00042.html [3]http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2011-q3/msg00037.html Thanks, Jie
libjava.patch
Description: Binary data
