On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
<kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been auditing the patterns in the arm backend that were added/modified
> for -mrestrict-it
> and I've come up with a few runtime tests that end up generating those
> patterns.
> This patch contains 4 tests for 4 patterns that have paths specific to
> -mrestrict-it.
>
> There were some patterns like thumb2_mov_negscc_strict_it and
> thumb2_mov_notscc_strict_it
> that I could not generate at all, because the earlier RTL optimisers always
> generated some
> equivalent but different (and at least as good) so these splitters never
> matched.
> I think we could safely remove them, but not at this stage.
>
> These tests should give us a bit more test coverage into the -mrestrict-it
> functionality.
>
> Ok for trunk?

OK - thanks for the audit.

Ramana
>
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
> 2016-02-05  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
>
>     * gcc.target/arm/cond_sub_restrict_it.c: New test.
>     * gcc.target/arm/condarith_restrict_it.c: Likewise.
>     * gcc.target/arm/movcond_restrict_it.c: Likewise.
>     * gcc.target/arm/negscc_restrict_it.c: Likewise.

Reply via email to