On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:24:36AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >2016-03-03 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
> >
> > PR c/69798
> > * c-parser.c (c_parser_postfix_expression): Call
> > c_parser_cast_expression instead of c_parser_postfix_expression.
> >
> > * gcc.dg/cilk-plus/pr69798-1.c: New test.
> > * gcc.dg/cilk-plus/pr69798-2.c: New test.
> I'd wait for gcc-7. There's actually further Cilk+ fixes queued up from
> Ryan. I wanted to get those into gcc-6, but just flat ran out of time.
> Perhaps ask for an exception to address the queued up Cilk+ stuff in a minor
> release?
Well, this one looks fairly safe to me even for gcc-6, and has the additional
benefit that
it affects solely Cilk+ and nothing else. Furthermore, I believe the
difference between cast and postfix expression is just in what is invalid
for Cilk+, so it shouldn't affect valid Cilk+ code, only invalid.
Jakub
