On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf <mar...@trippelsdorf.de> wrote: > On 2016.03.07 at 13:03 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:57:20PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> > (no strong opinion about that - but for example the recent -flifetime-dse >> > strengthening fallout is similar) >> >> -flifetime-dse change is different, we default to -flifetime-dse=2, but have >> a way for broken packages to workaround their bugs, so that situation is the >> same as with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks. > > If the situation was the same there would be no -flifetime-dse=2 flag at > all. Affected users would be told to use -fno-lifetime-dse for broken > code, just like they are told to use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks.
Yes, I said I would have told them that. But appearantly Jason had a different opinion... Richard. > -- > Markus
