On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 12:34:40PM -0500, Patrick Palka wrote: > Doesn't this mean that we call initializer_constant_valid_p at each > iteration? This would slow down the non-constant case even further. > So I wonder if the return value of initializer_constant_valid_p could > be cached or something, since it seems like a potentially expensive > predicate.
You're right, but I've already committed the patch. I'll write an
incremental patch and test it.
Jakub
