Ping! (Maybe I should have posted the follow-up patch in a separate thread to make it more visible.)
2011/8/13 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: > Hi Thomas, hi all, > > 2011/8/7 Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de>: >> When extending the values of gfc_dep_compare_expr, we will need to go >> through all its uses (making sure we change == -2 to <= -2). > > attached is a patch which makes a start with this. > > For now, it changes the return value to "-3" for two cases: > 1) different expr_types > 2) non-identical variables > > I tried to take care of all places which are checking for a return > value of "-2" and I hope I missed none. > > Any objections or ok for trunk? (Regtested successfully.) > > Cheers, > Janus > > > 2011-08-13 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR fortran/49638 > * dependency.c (gfc_dep_compare_expr): Add new result value "-3". > (gfc_check_element_vs_section,gfc_check_element_vs_element): Handle > result value "-3". > * frontend-passes.c (optimize_comparison): Ditto. > * interface.c (gfc_check_typebound_override): Ditto. > > > 2011-08-13 Janus Weil <ja...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR fortran/49638 > * gfortran.dg/typebound_override_1.f90: Modified. >
