On 05/06/2016 05:40 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > +#if __cplusplus >= 201103 > +/* C++11 claims to be available: use it: */ > +#define OVERRIDE override > +#define FINAL final > +#else > +/* No C++11 support; leave the macros empty: */ > +#define OVERRIDE > +#define FINAL > +#endif > +
Is there a reason this is preferred over using override/final in the sources directly, and then define them away as empty on pre-C++11? I mean: #if __cplusplus < 201103 # define override # define final #endif then use override/final throughout instead of OVERRIDE/FINAL. If building gcc as a C++11 program is supported, then it won't be possible to use these names as symbols for anything else anyway? Thanks, Pedro Alves
