On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:43:25PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:06:42 +0200, Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
> wrote:
> > Here are the OpenACC bits of <http://gcc.gnu.org/PR71373>.
>
> In the PR, Jakub clarified that all the missing other OMP_CLAUSE_* are in
> fact all unreachable here. OK to document this as follows, in trunk?
>
> The "anything else" default case in fact now is just the non-clause
> OMP_CLAUSE_ERROR, so when adding a case for that one, we could then
> remove the default case, and thus get a compiler warning when new clauses
> are added in the future, without handling them here. That makes sense to
> me (would have made apparent much earlier the original problem of missing
> handling for certain OMP_CLAUSE_*), but based on feedback received, it
> feels as if I'm the only supporter of such "defensive" programming
> paradigms?
>
> commit c6b10a9bc1437395c4931d43f30e778152a28cb2
> Author: Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Mon Jun 13 16:29:37 2016 +0200
>
> [PR middle-end/71373] Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_* in gcc/tree-nested.c
>
> gcc/
> * tree-nested.c (convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses):
> (convert_local_omp_clauses): Document missing OMP_CLAUSE_*.
Ok, but please mention the PR line above the ChangeLog entry. Thanks.
Jakub
