Hi!
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:43:25 +0200, Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Jun 2016 17:06:42 +0200, Thomas Schwinge <tho...@codesourcery.com>
> wrote:
> > Here are the OpenACC bits of <http://gcc.gnu.org/PR71373>.
>
> In the PR, Jakub clarified that all the missing other OMP_CLAUSE_* are in
> fact all unreachable here. [...]
>
> The "anything else" default case in fact now is just the non-clause
> OMP_CLAUSE_ERROR, so when adding a case for that one, we could then
> remove the default case, and thus get a compiler warning when new clauses
> are added in the future, without handling them here. That makes sense to
> me (would have made apparent much earlier the original problem of missing
> handling for certain OMP_CLAUSE_*), but based on feedback received, it
> feels as if I'm the only supporter of such "defensive" programming
> paradigms?
That is, something like that:
--- gcc/tree-nested.c
+++ gcc/tree-nested.c
@@ -1225,8 +1225,9 @@ convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses (tree *pclauses, struct
walk_stmt_info *wi)
case OMP_CLAUSE__LOOPTEMP_:
case OMP_CLAUSE__SIMDUID_:
case OMP_CLAUSE__GRIDDIM_:
- /* Anything else. */
- default:
+ /* This non-clause should never be seen outside of the front
+ ends. */
+ case OMP_CLAUSE_ERROR:
gcc_unreachable ();
}
}
@@ -1933,8 +1934,9 @@ convert_local_omp_clauses (tree *pclauses, struct
walk_stmt_info *wi)
case OMP_CLAUSE__LOOPTEMP_:
case OMP_CLAUSE__SIMDUID_:
case OMP_CLAUSE__GRIDDIM_:
- /* Anything else. */
- default:
+ /* This non-clause should never be seen outside of the front
+ ends. */
+ case OMP_CLAUSE_ERROR:
gcc_unreachable ();
}
}
Grüße
Thomas
