On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:53 AM, James Greenhalgh <james.greenha...@arm.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:48:38PM -0700, Jim Wilson wrote: >> This adds a tuning structure for qdf24xx. This was tested with an
> Have you seen my recent patch for Cortex-A57 that changes the costs there > to be relative to the cost of a floating-point register to floating-point > register move [1]? I found that gave me a number of > improvements due to comparisons in the compiler that assume a move in a > mode is cheap, and other costs will be defined relative to it. > > Did you consider that for the qdf24xx costs? No. We haven't considered that. However, we have plans to revist some of this tuning work when we get updated docs, so we can take a look at this then. Jim
