On 07/08/2016 02:54 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 07/08/2016 01:59 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> >> Gah, that's not right, that'll swap the numbers of kept/removed loops. >> >> I think the right answer is simply >> for (i = 0; i < n - IRA_MAX_LOOPS_NUM; i++) >> >> >> Bernd > > Thank you for the help, I've been testing the suggested change. > > Martin >
It survives regression tests and bootstrap. May I install the patch? Thanks, Martin
