Hi Andrew,
On 15/07/16 17:28, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:08 AM, kugan
<kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Why separate out early VRP from tree-vrp? Just a little curious.
It is based on the discussion in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-01/msg00069.html.
In summary, conclusion (based on my understanding) was to implement a
simplified VRP algorithm that doesn't require ASSERT_EXPR insertion.
But I don't see why you are moving it from tree-vrp.c . That was my
question, you pointing to that discussion does not say to split it
into a new file and expose these interfaces.
Are you saying that I should keep this part of tree-vrp.c. I am happy to
do that if this is considered the best approach.
Thanks,
Kugan