On 07/22/2016 05:19 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
I hope I've satisfactorily explained the failures you've pointed out (thanks for the data). I think I should leave the choice of what to do next (revert the patch or leave it in and install fixups where appropriate) up to you?
What's the motivation for supporting -fno-toplevel-reorder anyway? That's practically just a legacy mode as far as I know.
Bernd
