On 08/01/2016 10:44 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
What's the motivation for supporting -fno-toplevel-reorder anyway? That's
practically just a legacy mode as far as I know.
It's for code that uses toplevel asms in ways for which it matters where
they appear in relation to functions in the .s file, or otherwise uses
asms or has a build system that manipulates the .s file in ways that break
with reordering.
Yes, but that sort of thing tends not to work with nvptx anyway, so I
still don't really see the point.
Bernd
