On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:23:58PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/14/2016 01:21 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote: > > From: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org> > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > 2016-09-13 Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org> > > > > * emit-rtl.c (next_nonnote_insn): Change argument type to > > rtx_insn *. > > (prev_nonnote_insn): Likewise. > > * jump.c (reversed_comparison_code_parts): Likewise. > > (reversed_comparison): Likewise. > > * rtl.h: Adjust prototypes. > > * config/arc/arc.md: Adjust. > > * cse.c (find_comparison_args): Likewise. > > * reorg.c (redundant_insn): Change return type to rtx_insn *. > > (fix_reg_dead_note): Change argument type to rtx_insn *. > > (delete_prior_computation): Likewise. > > (delete_computation): Likewise. > > (fill_slots_from_thread): Adjust. > > (relax_delay_slots): Likewise. > > * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_unary_operation_1): Likewise. > > (simplify_relational_operation_1): Likewise. > > (simplify_ternary_operation): Likewise. > The arc bits are similar in nature to the sh bits in how they match on the > CODE_LABEL rather than on the enclosing LABEL_REF. I think cleaning up > those warts can be deferred. > > > OK once all prereqs are approved. > > I don't see any more patches in this series in my inbox. Is that consistent > with your tracking?
I think the only thing not approved at this point is 1/8, which needs a fixup that was discussed a little while ago, and some retesting for that. Thanks for the reviews! Trev > > jeff
