On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 03:23:58PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 01:21 PM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org>
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > 2016-09-13 Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org>
> > * emit-rtl.c (next_nonnote_insn): Change argument type to
> > rtx_insn *.
> > (prev_nonnote_insn): Likewise.
> > * jump.c (reversed_comparison_code_parts): Likewise.
> > (reversed_comparison): Likewise.
> > * rtl.h: Adjust prototypes.
> > * config/arc/arc.md: Adjust.
> > * cse.c (find_comparison_args): Likewise.
> > * reorg.c (redundant_insn): Change return type to rtx_insn *.
> > (fix_reg_dead_note): Change argument type to rtx_insn *.
> > (delete_prior_computation): Likewise.
> > (delete_computation): Likewise.
> > (fill_slots_from_thread): Adjust.
> > (relax_delay_slots): Likewise.
> > * simplify-rtx.c (simplify_unary_operation_1): Likewise.
> > (simplify_relational_operation_1): Likewise.
> > (simplify_ternary_operation): Likewise.
> The arc bits are similar in nature to the sh bits in how they match on the
> CODE_LABEL rather than on the enclosing LABEL_REF. I think cleaning up
> those warts can be deferred.
> OK once all prereqs are approved.
> I don't see any more patches in this series in my inbox. Is that consistent
> with your tracking?
I think the only thing not approved at this point is 1/8, which needs a
fixup that was discussed a little while ago, and some retesting for
Thanks for the reviews!