On 09/21/2016 01:11 AM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2016.09.11 at 20:03 -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 09/08/2016 04:10 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Martin Sebor wrote:
PR middle-end/49905 - Better sanity checking on sprintf src & dest to
produce warning for dodgy code
The patch uses "nul" instead of "null" throughout.
Yes, that's intentional. NUL and null are alternate spellings for
the same character. I went with nul to distinguish it from the null
pointer and used all lowercase as per the GCC convention.