On 06/12/16 06:05 -0500, Tim Song wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
Oh, but if you mean what the standard should say, my issue submission
proposed "Throws: Nothing." for the ones with a narrow contract. It
should be in the issue list soon, but I only sent it yesterday.
Yes, I was talking about the standard. Maybe it would have been clearer
if I just quoted the second sentence.
I had my libstdc++ hat on and forgot I'd even submitted an issue, so
had lost the relevant context!
Of course there's no problem with you strengthening noexcept in your
implementation :)
