On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:17:48PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 07/02/17 15:04 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks much for the review. Looks ok now?
>
> I'd suggest adding something to say that the reason these are now
> being diagnosed is that G++ used to treat e.g. this->member, where
> member has a non-dependent type, as type-dependent, and now it
> doesn't.
Like this?
Index: porting_to.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-7/porting_to.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 porting_to.html
--- porting_to.html 7 Feb 2017 14:22:39 -0000 1.5
+++ porting_to.html 8 Feb 2017 11:05:22 -0000
@@ -52,7 +52,9 @@
<p>
As a consequence, the following examples are invalid and G++ will no longer
-compile them:
+compile them, because, in the following examples, G++ used to treat
+<code>this-><em>member</em></code> where member has a non-dependent type, as
+type-dependent, and now it doesn't.
</p>
<pre><code>
Marek
