Sorry, I must have missed that one. They're committed. Thanks!
On Wed, 08 Feb 2017 03:33:19 PST (-0800), ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: > Hi Palmer, > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> These were suggested as part of our review process, but I never got an >> OK on them. Am I meant to just commit these? > > I am pretty sure I acked htdocs/readings.html (see the mail below). > > backends.html I am not sufficiently knowledgable, but since we trust > you to maintain the port, it makes sense to trust you to describe the > port's characteristics, too. ;-) > > So, both are okay. > > Thanks, > Gerald > > ======== forwarded message ======== > From: Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> > To: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@dabbelt.com> > Cc: jos...@codesourcery.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 22:55:05 +0100 (CET) > Subject: Re: New Port for RISC-V v2 > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2017, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> How do these look? > > Fine for readings.html. backends.html, not my cup of tea. ;-) > > Gerald
