On 19 June 2017 at 11:16, Thomas Preudhomme
> On 19/06/17 08:41, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>> On 15 June 2017 at 18:18, Thomas Preudhomme
>> <thomas.preudho...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>>> Conditions checked for ARM targets in vector-related effective targets
>>> are inconsistent:
>>> * sometimes arm*-*-* is checked
>>> * sometimes Neon is checked
>>> * sometimes arm_neon_ok and sometimes arm_neon is used for neon check
>>> * sometimes check_effective_target_* is used, sometimes
>>> This patch consolidate all of these check into using is-effective-target
>>> arm_neon and when little endian was checked, the check is kept.
>>> ChangeLog entry is as follows:
>>> *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
>>> 2017-06-06 Thomas Preud'homme <thomas.preudho...@arm.com>
>>> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_vect_int):
>>> current ARM check by ARM NEON's availability check.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_intfloat_cvt): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_uintfloat_cvt): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_floatint_cvt): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_floatuint_cvt): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_shift): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_whole_vector_shift): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_bswap): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_shift_char): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_long): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_float): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_perm): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_perm_byte): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_perm_short): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_widen_sum_qi_to_hi): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_widen_mult_qi_to_hi): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_widen_mult_hi_to_si): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_widen_shift): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_extract_even_odd): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_interleave): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_multiple_sizes): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect64): Likewise.
>>> (check_effective_target_vect_max_reduc): Likewise.
>>> Testing: Testsuite shows no regression when targeting ARMv7-A with
>>> -mfpu=neon-fpv4 and -mfloat-abi=hard or when targeting Cortex-M3 with
>>> default FPU and float ABI (soft). Testing was done with both
>>> and the updated dg-cmp-results proposed in
>>> Is this ok for trunk?
>> I applied your patch on top of r249233, and noticed quite a few changes:
>> Note that "Big-Regression" cases are caused by the fact that there a
>> are PASS->XPASS and XFAILs disappear with your patch, and many
>> (3000-4000) PASS disappear.
>> In that intended?
> It certainly is not. I'd like to investigate this but the link to results
> for rev 249233 is broken. Could you provide me with the results you have for
> that so that I can compare manually?
The results for 249233 are here:
(reminder, I'm using dejagnu-1.6+, thus pre-pending multilib flags rather than
> Best regards,