> So, the patch for build_constant_desc does not have the desired effect.
OK, too bad that we need to play this back-and-forth game with MEMs. So the original patch is OK (with TREE_READONLY (base) on the next line to mimic what is done just above and without the gcc/ prefix in the ChangeLog). If you have some available cycles, you can test and install the build_constant_desc change in the same commit, otherwise I'll do it myself. -- Eric Botcazou