On 10/10/2011 01:19 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Tests gcc.target/powerpc/warn-[12].c fail for soft-float multilibs with
> the unexpected warning "-mvsx requires hardware floating point [enabled
> by default]". This patch skips those tests for soft-float multilibs and
> modifies the powerpc check for a soft-float effective target to return
> true for either __NO_FPRS__ or _SOFT_FLOAT being defined.
>
> Is this OK for trunk? I must admit that I'm not sure what all those
> Power float variants are for.
On second thought these tests should use
/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
instead of requiring hard_float, and forget about the proposed
change to effective target hard_float. Is that OK?
Janis
