On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:21:21PM +0200, Janus Weil wrote: > 2018-06-28 18:22 GMT+02:00 Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>: > > > > Why I think it a warning should be emitted: symmetry!. > > > > You complained about the lack of symmetry in 'check() .and. .false.' > > and '.false. .and. check()'. > > well, my original complaint in PR85599 was that the second one is > broken, and your reaction to that is to break the first one as well. >
Rose colored glasses. You say 'break'. I say 'fix'. Fortunately, I'm done with this discussion. Do what you want. -- Steve
