> Ah!  But that still doesn't explain why you want to skip these passes
> when building thunks.

They simply don't work because there is no CFG for thunks; I can add a blurb 
about that.

> So is the barrier correct, or isn't it?  There's really no two ways
> about this.  I don't like arbitrary changes that are justified solely on
> 'that's what another port does'.

The barrier is required by the arm_reorg pass, but it is optional when the 
pass is not run.  I think that we can consider that it is also correct.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to