> Ah! But that still doesn't explain why you want to skip these passes > when building thunks.
They simply don't work because there is no CFG for thunks; I can add a blurb about that. > So is the barrier correct, or isn't it? There's really no two ways > about this. I don't like arbitrary changes that are justified solely on > 'that's what another port does'. The barrier is required by the arm_reorg pass, but it is optional when the pass is not run. I think that we can consider that it is also correct. -- Eric Botcazou