Hi Jason, >> Looks good to me. Independently, do you see a reason not to disable the >> old demangler entirely? > > Like so. Does anyone object to this? These mangling schemes haven't > been relevant in decades.
I am not really familiar with this old scheme, so please excuse my ignorance in asking these questions: * How likely is it that there are old toolchain in use out there that still use the v2 mangling ? Ie I guess that I am asking "which generation(s) of gcc used v2 mangling ?" * If a user does try to demangle a v2 mangled name, what will happen ? Ie I guess I am asking if they will be given a hint that they need to use an older toolchain in order to demangle the names. Cheers Nick