On 2018-12-14 5:39 p.m., Jason Merrill wrote: > GDB/binutils folks, how do you want to handle this? Shall I go ahead > with this patch, with the understanding that there will be associated > changes necessary when merging it into the binutils-gdb repository, or > go with the small disabling patch to start with?
Hi Jason >From the GDB point of view, I don't see any problem. Please proceed with the cleanup, it should be quite easy to adjust our code when we sync libiberty. There is a usage of cplus_mangle_opname in binutils/stabs.c, and I can't speak for binutils. But speaking of cplus_mangle_opname, shouldn't you also remove the declaration in include/demangle.h? Simon
