> Hi, > > this verifier error happens because first IPA-split splits a comdat > function creating a comdat local callee and then IPA-SRA comes along, > modifies the caller, makes it a local clone in the process but because > it does not set the comdat group to the original, the verifier sees a > call from outside of the comdat group to a private comdat symbol, which > it does not like. > > Fixed by doing what IPA-split does in the patch below. Bootstrapped and > tested on x86_64-linux. OK for trunk? > > Thanks, > > Martin > > > 2019-11-21 Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> > > PR ipa/91956 > * ipa-sra.c (process_isra_node_results): Put the new node to the > same comdat group as the original node. > > testsuite/ > * g++.dg/ipa/pr91956.C: New test. > --- > gcc/ipa-sra.c | 3 +++ > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr91956.C | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pr91956.C > > diff --git a/gcc/ipa-sra.c b/gcc/ipa-sra.c > index 08606aeded1..c6ed0f44b87 100644 > --- a/gcc/ipa-sra.c > +++ b/gcc/ipa-sra.c > @@ -3759,6 +3759,9 @@ process_isra_node_results (cgraph_node *node, > = node->create_virtual_clone (callers, NULL, new_adjustments, "isra", > suffix_counter); > suffix_counter++; > + if (node->same_comdat_group) > + new_node->add_to_same_comdat_group (node); > + new_node->calls_comdat_local = node->calls_comdat_local;
This looks correct, but since I do not remember how that is done, can you please double-check that the symbol actually gets output into the given comdat section in the assembly file? Honza
