On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > What about the previous patch fixing the existing testism by skipping for > big-endian arm using existing target supports?
I thought this was an update containing both - so yes, that's OK as well. Richard. > On 07/01/2020 07:31, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Dec 2019, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > > > >> Consequently whilst looking at the list I noticed these two were missing. > >> > >> This OK for trunk? > > > > Yes. > > > > Thanks, > > Richard. > > > >> gcc/ChangeLog: > >> 2019-12-13 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> > >> > >> * doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_little_endian, arm_nothumb): > >> Documented existing target checks. > >> > >> On 13/12/2019 13:05, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > >>> Thanks for pointing it out Rainer. Thanks to that reminder I noticed there > >>> is a different way to achieve this without adding that extra target check. > >>> > >>> This OK? > >>> > >>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > >>> > >>> 2019-12-12 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> > >>> > >>> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: XFAIL for arm big endian. > >>> > >>> On 12/12/2019 17:41, Rainer Orth wrote: > >>>> Hi Andre, > >>>> > >>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > >>>>> > >>>>> 2019-12-12 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> * gcc.dg/vect/vect-epilogues.c: XFAIL for arm big endian. > >>>>> * lib/target-supports.exp > >>>>> (check_effective_target_arm_big_endian): > >>>>> New target selector. > >>>> > >>>> as always, this needs documenting in sourcebuild.texi. > >>>> > >>>> Rainer > >>>> > >> > > > -- Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany; GF: Felix Imendörffer; HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
