On 12/10/2011 02:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Using the parent node for aliases (as in your patch) makes sense, but I
don't see tree_function_versioning() segfaulting as you claim.  What I
see is estimate_function_body_sizes()

Humm you are seeing this I guess:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00427.html

When applied, you should probably see the tree_function_versioning problem.

Patrick.

Reply via email to