On 12/11/2011 09:11 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 12/10/11 17:13, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 12/10/2011 02:16 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Using the parent node for aliases (as in your patch) makes sense, but I
don't see tree_function_versioning() segfaulting as you claim. What I
see is estimate_function_body_sizes()
Humm you are seeing this I guess:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00427.html
When applied, you should probably see the tree_function_versioning
problem.
Indeed. This is what I am seeing. I have applied and committed the patch
and can no longer reproduce the problem.
Can you verify on your end, and close the bug if appropriate?
Yes the testcase attached in the PR works for me but I can't change the
status because I am not the reporter (nor admin).
However, the testcase I have added g++.dg/tm/ctor-used.C fails. I can
fill another PR but I found this problem thanks to the PR testcase.
Thanks for all your help here.
You are welcome.
Patrick.
