On 3/17/20 9:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 17/03/20 13:02 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:Shouldn't the test use { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } instead of:+// { dg-do compile } +// { dg-options "-std=c++11" } ?With that change I see: UNSUPPORTED: g++.dg/ext/pr94197.C -std=c++98 PASS: g++.dg/ext/pr94197.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) PASS: g++.dg/ext/pr94197.C -std=c++17 (test for excess errors) PASS: g++.dg/ext/pr94197.C -std=c++2a (test for excess errors) rather than: PASS: g++.dg/ext/pr94197.C (test for excess errors)
Yes, good point. Jason
