On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 16:52, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 16:42, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/17/20 9:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > > On 17/03/20 13:02 +0000, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >> Shouldn't the test use { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } instead of:
> > >>
> > >> +// { dg-do compile }
> > >> +// { dg-options "-std=c++11" }
> >
> > Yes, good point.
>
> Ack, changing to { dg-do compile { target c++11 } } and committing
> with the (correct :P) expectation that
> the change is still ok with that change.Jason, are backports ok too?
