Hi!  This patch is broken out from the test suite patch for the new
builtins support.  This one is just a minor adjustment for the error
message wording.

Tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu (-m32/-m64)
with no regressions.  Is this okay for trunk?

Thanks!
Bill


2021-11-17  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/testsuite/
        * gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c: Adjust error message.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
index e03099bd084..c1667d9f7db 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pragma_misc9.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ vector bool int
 test2 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b)
 {
   return vec_cmpnez (a, b);
-  /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9' 
option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+  /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vcmpnezw' requires the '-mcpu=power9' and 
'-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
 }
 
 #pragma GCC target ("cpu=power7")
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ vector signed int
 test3 (vector signed int a, vector signed int b)
 {
   return vec_mergee (a, b);
-  /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the 
'-mpower8-vector' option" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
+  /* { dg-error "'__builtin_altivec_vmrgew_v4si' requires the '-mcpu=power8' 
and '-mvsx' options" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */
 }
 
 #pragma GCC target ("cpu=power6")
-- 
2.27.0


Reply via email to