On 15 March 2012 15:40, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> ping. I think now could be a good time for applying the patch you
>> have for this issue as we are in stage 1.
> It will still regress the two libstdc++ testcases (well, I guess so at least).
> Jonathan - you didn't answer my reply to your question? Would it be ok
> to apply this patch with leaving the regressions in-place, to be investigated
> by libstdc++ folks?
Sorry, I've either forgotten or missed the reply - but if you think
the problem is in libstdc++ then certainly go ahead and apply it, I'll
investigate the libstdc++ problems (and ask for help if they defeat