On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15 March 2012 15:40, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Richard,
>>> ping.  I think now could be a good time for applying the patch you
>>> have for this issue as we are in stage 1.
>> It will still regress the two libstdc++ testcases (well, I guess so at 
>> least).
>> Jonathan - you didn't answer my reply to your question?  Would it be ok
>> to apply this patch with leaving the regressions in-place, to be investigated
>> by libstdc++ folks?
> Sorry, I've either forgotten or missed the reply - but if you think
> the problem is in libstdc++ then certainly go ahead and apply it, I'll
> investigate the libstdc++ problems (and ask for help if they defeat
> me!)

Ok.  I'll do so after re-testing the patch.


Reply via email to