Hi,
The attached patch adjusts vec_perm_const hook to accommodate the new parameter.
For rationale, please see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595128.html
OK to commit if bootstrap+test passes ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
index 2afe0445ed5..48759532ab3 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
@@ -31813,9 +31813,12 @@ arm_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (struct expand_vec_perm_d 
*d)
 /* Implement TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST.  */
 
 static bool
-arm_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1,
-                             const vec_perm_indices &sel)
+arm_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, machine_mode op_mode, rtx 
target,
+                             rtx op0, rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel)
 {
+  if (vmode != op_mode)
+    return false;
+
   struct expand_vec_perm_d d;
   int i, nelt, which;
 

Reply via email to