Hi, The attached patch adjusts vec_perm_const hook to accommodate the new parameter. For rationale, please see: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595128.html OK to commit if bootstrap+test passes ?
Thanks, Prathamesh
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc index 2afe0445ed5..48759532ab3 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc @@ -31813,9 +31813,12 @@ arm_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d) /* Implement TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST. */ static bool -arm_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1, - const vec_perm_indices &sel) +arm_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, machine_mode op_mode, rtx target, + rtx op0, rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel) { + if (vmode != op_mode) + return false; + struct expand_vec_perm_d d; int i, nelt, which;