On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Looking at how other targets implement this check, I don't think that >> this is a problem at all. This issue only shows on a non-bootstrapped >> build. A full bootstrap will use correct address. > > The other place where it shows up is cross compilers but who is going > to use a 3.2 compiler with GCC 4.8 anyways? >
FWIW, I have no problem with checking __LP64__ only. I just want to mention this potential issue. Thanks. -- H.J.
