On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:28 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Looking at how other targets implement this check, I don't think that
>>>> this is a problem at all. This issue only shows on a non-bootstrapped
>>>> build. A full bootstrap will use correct address.
>>> The other place where it shows up is cross compilers but who is going
>>> to use a 3.2 compiler with GCC 4.8 anyways?
>> FWIW, I have no problem with checking __LP64__ only. I just want to
>> mention this potential issue.
> Here is a different patch. It checks sizeof (void *) for those hosts
> where it is appropriate. Does it look OK?
Looks OK to me, but you need a GWP reviewer to OK this change now...