On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 07:36:07 +0200
Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> We really want consistency about the dynamic linker names etc. across
> different targets and sneaking silently multiarch paths on one architecture
> would make it inconsistent with all the others.  So, please just use
> /libhf/ld-linux.so.3.

I personally find /libhf extremely ugly. If having a second path is a problem, 
how about using the triplet in the filename? Like:



Unique per arch and not multiarched. And AFAIK, Linux can handle long filenames 
just fine...


Reply via email to