On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:34:45PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:22 PM Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > Happy new year everyone. > > > > > > Is this patch okay to commit? > > > > From a wwwdocs perspective, yes. > > > > Are you also *asking* from an architectural/"strategic" perspective, > > or simply *informing*? :-) The former I cannot approve, the latter I > > certainly can.
Strategic, yes. Good way of phrasing it, thanks :-) > Note this is more info for port maintainers not for users and > changes.html is for users. And users will notice some ports will have to be removed, because those ports are not maintained / not maintained enough. Some ports will not work with LRA, most will be easy to fix, but someone will have to do that. If no one does so the port works sufficiently well it will have to be removed before release. > "In a future release" is also quite vague. It's what we usually say in changes.html . "In GCC 14" if you want? I can add some stuff on how this will benefit users? Segher
