> On Jan 11, 2023, at 2:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:42:22PM -0500, Paul Koning wrote:
>> Or, as in my case, because building with LRA as the default triggers an ICE
>> that I don't understand. I posted a note to the GCC list about what I saw,
>> but have received no reaction.
>
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-January/240497.html>?
I just saw that, thanks!
> I would say your predicates are way too lenient here (general_operand),
> but this needs more info. A testcase to reproduce the problem, to
> start with :-)
I'll try to trim it down.
What do you mean "too lenient"? The first input operand (which is supposed to
be the same as the output since the instruction set is 2-address) is
"general_operand". The destination is "nonimmediate_operand" which fits the
constraints applied to it.
paul
