The gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-[23].c tests FAIL on 32 and 64-bit
SPARC:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized
1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized
1 loops" 1
As discussed in the PR, they require vect_long_long support, but fail
to require that.
This patch fixes this.
Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11.
Ok for trunk?
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
2023-01-20 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
gcc/testsuite:
PR testsuite/107808
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c: Require vect_long_long.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c: Likewise.
# HG changeset patch
# Parent d221c189db0b3879bb343bc381eca6b730ad3010
testsuite: Fix gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-[23].c on SPARC [PR107808]
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_long_long } */
#include <stdarg.h>
#include "tree-vect.h"
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_long_long } */
#include <stdarg.h>
#include "tree-vect.h"
