On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 11:44 AM Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > > The gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-[23].c tests FAIL on 32 and 64-bit > SPARC: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects > scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c scan-tree-dump-times vect > "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects > scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vect > "vectorized 1 loops" 1 > > As discussed in the PR, they require vect_long_long support, but fail > to require that. > > This patch fixes this. > > Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11. > > Ok for trunk?
OK. > Rainer > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University > > > 2023-01-20 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> > > gcc/testsuite: > PR testsuite/107808 > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-2.c: Require vect_long_long. > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-bitfield-write-3.c: Likewise. >
