Here we're mishandling the unevaluated array new-expressions due to a
supposed non-constant array size ever since r12-5253-g4df7f8c79835d569,
made us no longer perform constant evaluation of non-manifestly-constant
expressions within unevaluated contexts. This shouldn't make a
difference here since the array sizes are constant literals, except
they're actually NON_LVALUE_EXPR location wrappers wrapping INTEGER_CST,
wrappers which used to get stripped as part of constant evaluation and
now no longer do. Moreover it means build_vec_init can't constant fold
the 'maxindex' passed from build_new_1 (since it uses maybe_constant_value
with mce_unknown).
This patch fixes the first issue by making maybe_constant_value and
fold_non_dependent_expr_template shortcut handling location wrappers
around constant nodes, and the second issue by using fold_build2_loc
instead of cp_build_binary_op when computing the maxindex to pass to
build_vec_init.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk/12?
PR c++/108219
PR c++/108218
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.cc (maybe_constant_value): Extend the constant node
shortcut to look through location wrappers too.
(fold_non_dependent_expr_template): Mirror the constant node
shortcut from maybe_constant_value.
* init.cc (build_new_1): Use fold_build2_loc instead
of cp_build_binary_op to build a MINUS_EXPR representing the
maximum index.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/new6.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-new1.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/constexpr.cc | 8 ++++++--
gcc/cp/init.cc | 18 ++++++++----------
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/new6.C | 9 +++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-new1.C | 13 +++++++++++++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/new6.C
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-new1.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index aa2c14355f8..d38c4c80415 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -8538,9 +8538,9 @@ maybe_constant_value (tree t, tree decl /* = NULL_TREE */,
t = mark_non_constant (t);
return t;
}
- else if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (t))
+ else if (CONSTANT_CLASS_OR_WRAPPER_P (t))
/* No caching or evaluation needed. */
- return t;
+ return tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (t);
if (manifestly_const_eval != mce_unknown)
return cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, true, true,
@@ -8631,6 +8631,10 @@ fold_non_dependent_expr_template (tree t, tsubst_flags_t
complain,
return t;
}
+ if (CONSTANT_CLASS_OR_WRAPPER_P (t))
+ /* No evaluation needed. */
+ return tree_strip_any_location_wrapper (t);
+
if (cp_unevaluated_operand && !manifestly_const_eval)
return t;
diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.cc b/gcc/cp/init.cc
index 705a5b3bdb6..574d2e2586c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/init.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/init.cc
@@ -3653,16 +3653,14 @@ build_new_1 (vec<tree, va_gc> **placement, tree type,
tree nelts,
error ("parenthesized initializer in array new");
return error_mark_node;
}
- init_expr
- = build_vec_init (data_addr,
- cp_build_binary_op (input_location,
- MINUS_EXPR, outer_nelts,
- integer_one_node,
- complain),
- vecinit,
- explicit_value_init_p,
- /*from_array=*/0,
- complain);
+ tree maxindex = fold_build2_loc (input_location, MINUS_EXPR,
+ TREE_TYPE (outer_nelts),
+ outer_nelts,
+ build_one_cst (TREE_TYPE
+ (outer_nelts)));
+ init_expr = build_vec_init (data_addr, maxindex, vecinit,
+ explicit_value_init_p, /*from_array=*/0,
+ complain);
}
else
{
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/new6.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/new6.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..17a669b42d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/new6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// PR c++/108218
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<class T>
+void f() {
+ decltype(new int[-1]) p; // { dg-error "negative" }
+}
+
+decltype(new int[-1]) q; // { dg-error "negative" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-new1.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-new1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..62007205108
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-new1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// PR c++/108219
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T>
+concept C = requires { new T[1]{{ 42 }}; };
+
+template<class T>
+concept D = requires { new T[2][1]{{{ 42 }}, {{ 42 }}}; };
+
+struct A { A(int); };
+
+static_assert(C<A>);
+static_assert(D<A>);
--
2.39.2.501.gd9d677b2d8
