On Jun 20 2023, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > Is it safe even on 64bit targets? I mean, doesn't say PowerPC already allow > full 64-bit virtual address space? The assumption that one can't have > more than half of virtual address space allocations is true right now at > least on x86-64, aarch64 and others, but isn't that something that can > change with newer versions of CPUs without the need to recompile > applications (add another level or two of page tables)?
At least s390 can allocate more than half the address space. That triggered a failure in gawk. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
