Hi Cooper,

I addressed this in April this year.
It even got an "ok", but nobody pushed it:
  https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-April/616972.html

BR
Christoph

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 5:39 PM Xianmiao Qu <cooper...@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> The frame related load/store instructions should not been
> scheduled bewteen echo other, and the REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR
> expression note should should be added to those instructions
> to prevent this.
> This bug cause ICE during GCC bootstap, and it will also ICE
> in the simplified case mempair-4.c, compilation fails with:
> during RTL pass: dwarf2
> theadmempair-4.c:20:1: internal compiler error: in 
> dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset, at dwarf2cfi.cc:1376
> 0xa8c017 dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset
>         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:1376
> 0xa8c017 dwarf2out_frame_debug
>         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2285
> 0xa8c017 scan_insn_after
>         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2726
> 0xa8cc97 scan_trace
>         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2893
> 0xa8d84d create_cfi_notes
>         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2933
> 0xa8d84d execute_dwarf2_frame
>         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:3309
> 0xa8d84d execute
>         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:3799
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * config/riscv/thead.cc (th_mempair_save_regs): Add
>         REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR note for mempair instuctions.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>         * gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc                     |  6 +++--
>  .../gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c        | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
> index 75203805310..2df709226f9 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
> @@ -366,10 +366,12 @@ th_mempair_save_regs (rtx operands[4])
>  {
>    rtx set1 = gen_rtx_SET (operands[0], operands[1]);
>    rtx set2 = gen_rtx_SET (operands[2], operands[3]);
> +  rtx dwarf = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (2));
>    rtx insn = emit_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, gen_rtvec (2, set1, 
> set2)));
>    RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
> -  add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_OFFSET, copy_rtx (set1));
> -  add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_OFFSET, copy_rtx (set2));
> +  XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 0) = copy_rtx (set1);
> +  XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 1) = copy_rtx (set2);
> +  add_reg_note (insn, REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR, dwarf);
>  }
>
>  /* Similar like riscv_restore_reg, but restores two registers from memory
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..d653f056ef4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-O1" "-g" "-Oz" "-Os" "-flto" } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_xtheadmempair -O2 -g -mtune=thead-c906" { 
> target { rv64 } } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-march=rv32gc_xtheadmempair -O2 -g -mtune=thead-c906" { 
> target { rv32 } } } */
> +
> +void a();
> +void b(char *);
> +void m_fn1(int);
> +int e;
> +
> +int foo(int ee, int f, int g) {
> +  char *h = (char *)__builtin_alloca(1);
> +  b(h);
> +  b("");
> +  int i = ee;
> +  e = g;
> +  m_fn1(f);
> +  a();
> +  e = i;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.ldd\t" 3 { target { rv64 } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.sdd\t" 3 { target { rv64 } } } } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.lwd\t" 3 { target { rv32 } } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.swd\t" 3 { target { rv32 } } } } */
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Reply via email to