Yeah, I've applied patches on my local tree and running the testsuite.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 3:11 PM Philipp Tomsich
<philipp.toms...@vrull.eu> wrote:
>
> Looks like I missed the OK on this one.
> I can pick it up today, unless you Kito already has it in flight?
>
> Thanks,
> Philipp.
>
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 17:51, Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@sifive.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christoph:
>>
>> Ooops, I thought Philipp will push those patches, does here any other
>> patches got approved but not committed? I can help to push those
>> patches tomorrow.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:42 PM Christoph Müllner
>> <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Cooper,
>> >
>> > I addressed this in April this year.
>> > It even got an "ok", but nobody pushed it:
>> >   https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-April/616972.html
>> >
>> > BR
>> > Christoph
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 5:39 PM Xianmiao Qu <cooper...@linux.alibaba.com> 
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > The frame related load/store instructions should not been
>> > > scheduled bewteen echo other, and the REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR
>> > > expression note should should be added to those instructions
>> > > to prevent this.
>> > > This bug cause ICE during GCC bootstap, and it will also ICE
>> > > in the simplified case mempair-4.c, compilation fails with:
>> > > during RTL pass: dwarf2
>> > > theadmempair-4.c:20:1: internal compiler error: in 
>> > > dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset, at dwarf2cfi.cc:1376
>> > > 0xa8c017 dwarf2out_frame_debug_cfa_offset
>> > >         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:1376
>> > > 0xa8c017 dwarf2out_frame_debug
>> > >         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2285
>> > > 0xa8c017 scan_insn_after
>> > >         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2726
>> > > 0xa8cc97 scan_trace
>> > >         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2893
>> > > 0xa8d84d create_cfi_notes
>> > >         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:2933
>> > > 0xa8d84d execute_dwarf2_frame
>> > >         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:3309
>> > > 0xa8d84d execute
>> > >         ../../../gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.cc:3799
>> > >
>> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
>> > >
>> > >         * config/riscv/thead.cc (th_mempair_save_regs): Add
>> > >         REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR note for mempair instuctions.
>> > >
>> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>> > >         * gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c: New test.
>> > > ---
>> > >  gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc                     |  6 +++--
>> > >  .../gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c        | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
>> > >  2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
>> > > index 75203805310..2df709226f9 100644
>> > > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
>> > > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/thead.cc
>> > > @@ -366,10 +366,12 @@ th_mempair_save_regs (rtx operands[4])
>> > >  {
>> > >    rtx set1 = gen_rtx_SET (operands[0], operands[1]);
>> > >    rtx set2 = gen_rtx_SET (operands[2], operands[3]);
>> > > +  rtx dwarf = gen_rtx_SEQUENCE (VOIDmode, rtvec_alloc (2));
>> > >    rtx insn = emit_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, gen_rtvec (2, set1, 
>> > > set2)));
>> > >    RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
>> > > -  add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_OFFSET, copy_rtx (set1));
>> > > -  add_reg_note (insn, REG_CFA_OFFSET, copy_rtx (set2));
>> > > +  XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 0) = copy_rtx (set1);
>> > > +  XVECEXP (dwarf, 0, 1) = copy_rtx (set2);
>> > > +  add_reg_note (insn, REG_FRAME_RELATED_EXPR, dwarf);
>> > >  }
>> > >
>> > >  /* Similar like riscv_restore_reg, but restores two registers from 
>> > > memory
>> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c 
>> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
>> > > new file mode 100644
>> > > index 00000000000..d653f056ef4
>> > > --- /dev/null
>> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/xtheadmempair-4.c
>> > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>> > > +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> > > +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-O1" "-g" "-Oz" "-Os" "-flto" } } 
>> > > */
>> > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_xtheadmempair -O2 -g -mtune=thead-c906" 
>> > > { target { rv64 } } } */
>> > > +/* { dg-options "-march=rv32gc_xtheadmempair -O2 -g -mtune=thead-c906" 
>> > > { target { rv32 } } } */
>> > > +
>> > > +void a();
>> > > +void b(char *);
>> > > +void m_fn1(int);
>> > > +int e;
>> > > +
>> > > +int foo(int ee, int f, int g) {
>> > > +  char *h = (char *)__builtin_alloca(1);
>> > > +  b(h);
>> > > +  b("");
>> > > +  int i = ee;
>> > > +  e = g;
>> > > +  m_fn1(f);
>> > > +  a();
>> > > +  e = i;
>> > > +}
>> > > +
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.ldd\t" 3 { target { rv64 } } } 
>> > > } */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.sdd\t" 3 { target { rv64 } } } 
>> > > } */
>> > > +
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.lwd\t" 3 { target { rv32 } } } 
>> > > } */
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "th.swd\t" 3 { target { rv32 } } } 
>> > > } */
>> > > --
>> > > 2.17.1
>> > >

Reply via email to