Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Jakub: do you remember what the reason was? I don't mind dropping >> "function", but it feels weird to drop the quotes around "simd". >> Seems like, if we do that, there'll one day be a patch to add >> them back. :) > > Because in OpenMP their are %<declare simd%> functions, not %<simd> > %functions, but we also have the %<simd%>/%<gnu::simd%> attribute as > extension.
Yeah, I can understand dropping the "function" bit. But why s/unsupported ... for %<simd%>/unsupported ... for simd/? Even if it's only a partial syntax quote, it is still a syntax quote. Thanks, Richard
