Btw, could you rebase to the trunk and run regression again?
I saw your report 670 FAILs:
# of expected passes 187616
# of unexpected failures 672
# of unexpected successes 14
# of expected failures 1436
# of unresolved testcases 615
# of unsupported tests 4731
I am recently working on fixing FAILs of risc-v regression. Your report looks
odd.
This is my report:
# of expected passes 183613
# of unexpected failures 92
# of unexpected successes 12
# of expected failures 1383
# of unresolved testcases 4
# of unsupported tests 4223
This is my report. It should be less than 100 FAILs.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
发件人： 钟居哲
发送时间： 2023-10-10 06:17
收件人： gcc-patches
抄送： macro; Jeff Law; rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng
主题： [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Enable `vect_pack_trunc'
&& [check_effective_target_arm_little_endian])
|| ([istarget mips*-*-*]
&& [et-is-effective-target mips_msa])
+ || [istarget riscv*-*-*]
|| ([istarget s390*-*-*]
&& [check_effective_target_s390_vx])
|| [istarget amdgcn*-*-*] }}]
You should change it into:
|| ([istarget riscv*-*-*]
&& [check_effective_target_riscv_v])
Then, these additional FAILs will be removed:
with no changes (except for intermittent Python failures for C++) with the
remaining testsuites. There are a few of regressions in `-march=rv64gc'
testing:
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97678.c scan-tree-dump vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-13-big-array.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing
stmts using SLP" 3
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-13.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using
SLP" 3
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97678.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump vect
"vectorizing stmts using SLP"
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-13-big-array.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 3
+FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-13.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect
"vectorizing stmts using SLP" 3
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
